Dingwall v. Friedman Fisher Associates, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where no evidence in record -that plaintiff “clearly understood” that salary was intended to compensate him for any hours worked, overtime compensation could not be computed using the fluctuating workweek method
• “The duties test for the professional exemption concerns whether the nature of the employee’s duties are appropriately considered professional.”
• defendants failed to show FWW method was proper where employee manuals stated that “ ‘[s]taff personnel are normally expected to work a 40 hour week’ ”
• engineer with decision-making authority satisfied duties test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).