Dingle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion for additional experts which were sought to rebut the State's evidence concerning the timing of the victim infant's injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• San Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-24· cited 91×
• Cade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-02· cited 30×
• Marshall v. Crosby
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-05-26· cited 29×
• Dingle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-01· cited 2×
• Nodal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-04
• Mangum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ake v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
• Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-01-21· cited 227×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-08-28· cited 31×
• Cade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-02· cited 30×
• Morgan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-02· cited 30×