Dingle v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing punitive damages claims against two police officers because plaintiff “relie[d] principally on conclusory assertions that the officers . . . acted outrageously and in reckless disregard of her well being”
• “The Court agrees that the District cannot be held liable for constitutional torts committed by employees, but it finds liability for common-law torts may be imposed on the District under the theory of respondeat superior.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).