Diners Club, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, Trustee of Dashew Business MacHines Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that appellant’s suit, for breach of contract due to a trustee’s alleged negligent employment of an untrustworthy employee, “clearly was in respect of the Trustee’s transactions in carrying on the debtor’s business”
• explaining that appellant’s suit, for breach of contract due to a trustee’s alleged negligent employment of an untrustworthy employee, “clearly was in respect of the Trustee’s transac- tions in carrying on the debtor’s business”
• explaining that because the original § 959 was enacted shortly after Barton, and given the content of Justice Miller’s dissent, it is clear that the purpose of § 959 was to enact the dissent into law
• in summarizing Justice Miller’s concession in his dissent that inspired the second sentence of Section 959(a
• “In the exercise of its jurisdiction over the debtor’s property, the court had power to issue injunctions and all other writs necessary to protect the estate from interference, and to ensure its orderly administration.”
• “In the exercise of its jurisdiction over the debtor’s property, the court had power to issue injunctions and all other writs necessary to protect the estate from interference, and to ensure its orderly administration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).