Dimmitt v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating attack based on lack of personal jurisdiction must be raised within reasonable time or may be barred
• stating “a void judgment need not necessarily be challenged within one year after its rendition as provided in [now rule 1.1013]”
• court entered a specific written nunc pro tunc order, expressing its intent that the dismissal entered the day before was without prejudice
• court entered a specific written nunc pro tunc order, expressing its intent that the dismissal entered the day before was without prejudice
• requiring strict compliance with the rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).