Dimmitt Chevrolet v. Southeastern Fidelity

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discharge of recycled oil into unlined pits from 1954 to 1974 not “sudden”
• “Because we conclude that the policy language is unambiguous, we find it inappropriate and unnecessary to consider the arguments pertaining to the drafting history of the [clause].”
• \[T]he construction of an insurance policy is a question of law. . . .\
• “The issue of whether an exclusionary clause precludes coverage for damages is a question of law.”
• “Our duty is to determine whether the [particular] word . . . is ambiguous in the context of the specific insurance policy at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).