DiMizio v. Romo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that consideration for loan modification agreement existed where creditor agreed to forgo the right to enforce original loan agreement
• explaining that “an express contract is evidenced by spoken or written words while an implied contract is evi- denced by the conduct of the parties”
• explaining that “an express contract is evidenced by spoken or written words while an implied contract is evi- denced by the conduct of the parties”
• explaining that “an express contract is evidenced by spoken or written words while an implied contract is evi- denced by the conduct of the parties”
• not explicitly discussing silence but finding acceptance where the offeree manifested acceptance by changing performance to comply with modified contract terms
• \A person typically cannot be held liable for breach of contract unless it is shown that she was a party to the contract. . . . Contractual obligations are personal in nature and privity of contract is essential for the establishment of contractual liability.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).