Skip to main content
· 1/9/1986

DiMeo v. Philbin

Citations

  • 502 A.2d 825
  • 1986 R.I. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the legislature's intent in providing for prejudgment interest was to encourage settlement of tort cases without delay
  • determining that prejudgment interest in personal injury action is purely statutory and therefore not an element of damages
  • “[T]he Legislature’s primary intention was not to add interest but to establish a device to encourage settlements of cases ....”
  • prejudgment interest in personal Kovacs and its progeny are not good law. 15 injury action purely statutory and therefore not an element of damages
  • prejudgment interest is ministerial in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.