Dimensional Communications, Inc. v. Oz Optics Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, “on accession, Canada affirmatively stated that it does not object to the methods of service set forth in Article 10(b) and (c
• looking to procedural rules in Ontario, Canada to determine whether service was valid
• “[T]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for service by mail . . . .”
• \[T]he Hague Convention permits alternate channels of service so long as they are not objected to by the receiving State.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).