Skip to main content
· 12/19/1989

DiMatteo v. County of Dona Ana

Citations

  • 785 P.2d 285
  • 109 N.M. 374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that res judicata does not apply when causes of action are different
  • holding in a worker’s compensation case that cause of action for worker’s compensation disability benefits presented question of fact of when “plaintiff knew or should have known that he was disabled”
  • considering article IV, section 34 in determining whether workers’ compensation proceeding should be before a court (pursuant to former statute) or before the WCD
  • “A district court is required to take judicial notice of its prior proceedings in the same cause.”
  • \A district court is required to take judicial notice of its prior proceedings in the same cause.\
  • evidence of impairment, restrictions related to injury, does not necessarily equate with disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarid, Chavez, Minzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.