Skip to main content
· 1/12/1959

Dimas v. Irvine

Citations

  • 167 Cal. App. 2d 78
  • 334 P.2d 82
  • 1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 2298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying summary judgment where bank 13 failed to eliminate issues of fact as to whether plaintiff authorized the mailing of account statements to the address on record with the bank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ashbubn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.