Skip to main content
· 12/31/2020

Dimalanta v. Dimalanta

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 6992

Syllabus

Civil contempt spousal support child support temporary support order service purge condition. A trial court does not err by finding a party in contempt for failure to comply with the terms of a temporary support order where the party failed to comply with the terms, regardless of whether the court subsequently makes an unrelated modification to the temporary order. A magistrate's decision finding a party in civil contempt is not effective unless it is adopted by the trial court. Where the record otherwise reflects that a party violated a temporary support order twice, and the trial court contemporaneously considers the two violations, the trial court does not err by finding that both violations constitute a \first offense\ and imposing a sentence accordingly. Proper service is not required where a party has actual notice of the contempt charges pending against him. A party does not establish that service was defective based on vague and unsubstantiated claims. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by imposing an unreasonable or impossible purge condition where the contemnor failed to present evidence that established the condition is unreasonable or impossible.

Judges: E.A. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.