Dimaio v. Democratic National Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that dismissal without prejudice is required if the dismissal is on standing grounds and not on the merits
• dismissing complaint for lack of standing because it did not “suggest in any way how [the] ‘injury1 could be redressed by a favorable judgment”
• explaining a plaintiff lacked standing where the complaint did not “suggest in any way how [the] ‘injury’ could be redressed by a favorable judgment”
• affirming dismissal of complaint for lack of standing but noting that “this dismissal is necessarily without prejudice”
• dismissing complaint for lack of standing because it did not “suggest in any way how [the] ‘injury’ could be redressed by a favorable judgment”
• vacating district court’s alternative ruling that purported to reach merits of complaint and holding that, where claims were subject to dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, district court was without jurisdiction to consider the merits of the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).