Skip to main content

DiLucia v. Clemens

Citations

  • 541 A.2d 765
  • 373 Pa. Super. 466
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under Pennsylvania law, the doctrine of laches has two elements: (1) inexcusable delay; and (2) prejudice’
  • “In order to prevail on his assertion of the equitable defense of laches, [the defendant] must establish both undue delay from [the plaintiffs] failure to exercise due diligence and prejudice resulting from the delay.”
  • where a “Declaration of Trust” named someone to hold a specific number of shares of stock in trust for another, and the trustee conceded an intent to create this trust, the fact that the shares were not segregated will not defeat the trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Brosky, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.