Dils Bros. & Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that de novo review is limited to the legal conclusions the trial court drew from its findings of fact
• stating that de novo review is limited to the legal conclusions the trial court drew from its findings of fact
• noting State v. Tijerina, 61 Wash.App. 626, 811 P.2d 241 (1991) (holding an invalid detention, beyond what was required for a traffic infraction, vitiated consent for a search since consent would not have been obtained otherwise)
• noting State v. Tijerina, 61 Wn. App. 626, 811 P.2d 241 (1991) (holding an invalid detention, beyond what was required for a traffic infraction, vitiated consent for a search since consent would not have been obtained otherwise)
• investigatory detention meets constitutional requirements only so long as officer reasonably suspects person seized is engaged in criminal activity
• investigatory detention meets constitutional requirements only so long as officer reasonably suspects person seized is engaged in criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).