DiLoreto v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing Board’s expertise in establishing presumptions and determining relative degrees of fault
• evaluating under due process clause insurance regulation creating presumption of fault regarding certain types of automobile accidents
• evaluating under due process clause insurance regulation creating presumption of fault regarding certain types of automobile accidents
• upholding the delegation of authority in a merit rating system which allows private insurers to assess surcharges when the insurer determines the insured was in excess of 50% at fault
• “Since we uphold the use of the presumption, we disagree... that the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence”
• the evidentiary presumption created by 211 Code Mass. Regs. 74.04(18) (1978) did not violate due process, because it was rebuttable, and because there was a rational connection between the circumstances set out in the presumption and the occurrence of accidents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).