DiLorenzo v. Juan Ortoo Holdings, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence which, by due diligence, could have been produced in the first proceeding is considered to have been available at the first proceeding” and, therefore, will not preclude the application of collateral estoppel
• evidence which, by due diligence, could have been produced in the prior proceeding is considered to have been available at the prior proceeding and therefore will not preclude the application of collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).