Dillon v. Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not include contributory negligence as a special defense in its jury charge, and therefore did not err
• assessing alleged jury confusion by examining logical consistency between answers to several interrogatories
• \[m]isuse occurs when a product is not used in a manner which should have been foreseen by the defendant\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).