Dillon v. Select Portfolio Servicing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that res judicata barred a mortgage-related FDCPA suit because the suit alleged merely “a continuation of the wrongful conduct alleged in the [prior] action” and “the same pattern of behavior” previously alleged
• stating arguments raised for first time in a motion for reconsideration are not preserved for appeal purposes
• “When a party makes an argument for the first time in a motion for reconsideration, the argument is not preserved for appeal.”
• “A second suit that contains additional factual allegations does not necessarily arise from a different factual transaction.”
• “Under federal law, a state court judgment receives the same preclusive effect as it would receive under the law of the state in which it was rendered.”
• “Under federal law, a state court judgment receives the same preclusive effect as it would receive under the law of the state in which it was rendered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).