Dillon v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the going and coming rule applied to an employee driving to the workplace to get work-related forms
• stating that “[m]ost courts endorse the general rule that an employee driving his or her own vehicle to and from the employee’s workplace is not with the scope of employment for the purpose of imposing vicarious liability upon the employer for the negligence of the employee-driver”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).