Skip to main content
· 7/1/2011

DILLON, DEMONE D., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that exclusion of evidence pertaining to victim’s credibility, which went to “the core” of the defense, was not harmless
  • finding that exclusion of evidence pertaining to victim’s credibility, which went to “the core” of the defense, was not harmless
  • finding that exclusion of evidence pertaining to victim’s credibility, which went to “the core” of the defense, was not harmless
  • holding Rape Shield Law does not preclude sexual history - 18 - J-A21031-21 admitted for impeachment or exculpatory purposes
  • agreeing that evidence of complainants prior sexual relations could establish motive to fabricate where defendant had previously told complainant’s boyfriend that she had cheated on the boyfriend
  • “If the proffered evidence is not speculation or conjecture, the trial court must conduct an in[-]camera hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.