Skip to main content
· 4/8/2005

Dillon Companies, Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co.

Citations

  • 369 F. Supp. 2d 1277
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9085
  • 2005 WL 1140552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring prejudice from insured’s decision to settle without notice to insurer
  • “Grants of coverage will be construed broadly and exclusions or limitations of coverage will be construed narrowly.” (citation omitted)
  • “The test to be applied in determining the intention of the parties to an insurance policy is not what the insurer intended the policy to mean, but what a reasonable person in the position of the insured would understand it to mean.” (citation omitted)
  • “Because an insurer drafts its own contracts, it bears the responsibility of making the meaning clear, and any failure to do so will result in strict construction against the insurer [and any] ambiguities will be construed in the way most favorable to the insured.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bostwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.