Dillinger, LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it likely that the Indiana Supreme Court would adopt a broad definition of \literary works\ to include videogames to avoid constitutional issues with a narrow definition
• “A defendant’s ‘non-trademark use’ is an element of the fair-use affirmative defense, the lack of which doesn’t necessarily preclude establishing the plaintiff’s prima facie case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).