Diller v. Nelson

Citations

• 10 Pa. Super. 449
• 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 300

Syllabus

<p>Rescission of fraudulent contract — Failure to meet notes.</p> <p>The mere fact that notes, given in payment for goods, were not met at maturity, even if the purchaser never intended to pay them is not sufficient to sustain a rescission of a contract for fraud.</p> <p>Evidence of insolvency — Fraudulent contract.</p> <p>The court is justified in refusing to permit the jury to pass upon the question of the vendee’s insolvency in April upon evidence that he had confessed a judgment at a date three months later, without any evidence as to the extent of his possessions at either time.</p>