Skip to main content
· 12/14/1953

Dillen v. Edwards

Citations

  • 263 S.W.2d 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to interrupt or object to public use indicates an intent to dedicate for public use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Westhues, Bohling, Barrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.