· 6/27/1983
Dillard v. Broyles
Citations
- 463 U.S. 1208
- 103 S. Ct. 3539
- 51 U.S.L.W. 3919
- 77 L. Ed. 2d 1389
- 1983 U.S. LEXIS 753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding expert’s trial affidavit that included rebuttal statements that were not included in the expert’s prior reports violated Rule 26(a)(2)(B)
- “Expert testimony exceeding the bounds of the expert's report is excludable pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1) . . . .”
- “[R]ebuttal expert testimony is not excepted from the reporting requirements of Rule 26(a)(2)(B)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.