Dillard University v. Lexington Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendants’ claim that Dillard requested new terms and conditions and defendants’ argument that the policies at issue were new policies which were renegotiated by the parties and finding that there was no evidence that Dillard voluntarily negotiated a reduction in coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).