Dill v. Inhabitants of Wareham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the lawyer had violated RPC 1.4(b) by failing to explain to the client how work on cases would be handled or what the client’s financial obliga- tions would be
• declining to disturb the trial panel's ruling in the absence of a cogent argument as to why it erred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).