Dilks v. Flohr Chevrolet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining exculpatory clause as provision “which deprives one contracting party of a right to recover for damages suffered through the negligence of the other contracting party” [emphasis supplied]
• excluding liability for “damage by accidental fire or other casualty not occurring through negligence of [Chevrolet] or those employed by or acting for [Chevrolet] alone”
• “the validity of a contractual provision which exculpates a person from liability for his own acts of negligence is well settled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).