Skip to main content
· 9/19/1991

Dika v. Department of Insurance & Finance

Citations

  • 817 P.2d 287
  • 312 Or. 106
  • 1991 Ore. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “shall,” in part, as “used in laws, regulations, or directives to express what is mandatory”
  • “To construe the word ‘shall’ as anything other than mandatory would thwart the intention of the legislature * * *.”
  • fiscal impact statement invalid because it did not make required projection as to economic effect of regulation, but simply stated that there would be economic effect
  • fiscal impact statement must provide estimate of economic impact “if the rule is adopted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fadeley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.