· 9/19/1991
Dika v. Department of Insurance & Finance
Citations
- 817 P.2d 287
- 312 Or. 106
- 1991 Ore. LEXIS 70
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining “shall,” in part, as “used in laws, regulations, or directives to express what is mandatory”
- “To construe the word ‘shall’ as anything other than mandatory would thwart the intention of the legislature * * *.”
- fiscal impact statement invalid because it did not make required projection as to economic effect of regulation, but simply stated that there would be economic effect
- fiscal impact statement must provide estimate of economic impact “if the rule is adopted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fadeley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.