DiGregorio v. Hartford Comprehensive Employee Benefit Service Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring appellant to “show prejudice in a relevant sense” due to a procedural violation of ERISA (quotations omitted)
• discussing how cross motions for summary judgment on the administrative record permits the court to make factual findings instead of granting inferences to each non-movant
• reviewing factual conclusion drawn by district court from record of proceedings for clear error
• “In short, [plaintiff] has not shown prejudice in a relevant sense.” (internal quotations and citation omitted)
• “Claimant must demonstrate how a plan’s flawed procedure prejudiced review of her claim.”
• “Claimant must demonstrate how a plan’s flawed procedure prejudiced review of her claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).