Skip to main content
· 10/13/2015

Digital Recognition Network, Inc. v. Hutchinson

Citations

  • 803 F.3d 952
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17768
  • 2015 WL 5933168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing Citizens for Equal Prot. v. Bruning, 455 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2006)
  • “[W]hen a plaintiff brings a pre-enforcement challenge to the constitutionality of a particular statutory provision, the causation element of standing requires the named defendants to possess authority to enforce the complained-of provision.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “When a plaintiff brings a pre-enforcement challenge to the constitutionality of a particular statutory provision, the causation element of standing requires the named defendants to possess authority to enforce the complained-of provision”
  • “The redressability prong is not met when a plaintiff seeks relief against a defendant with no power to enforce a challenged statute.” (quoting Bronson v. Swensen, 500 F.3d 1099, 1111 (10th Cir. 2007))
  • Dkt. No. 22, at 13

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Colloton, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.