DiGiacobbe v. Sestak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[i]t is possible . . . to conduct a review de novo on the record”
• explaining that the “standard of review for a master’s findings . . . is de novo”
• observing that “[i]t is possible . . . to conduct a review de novo on the record”
• holding a new trial or further evidentiary hearings are not necessary where the Court can read the relevant portion of the factual record and draw its own conclusions
• “In reviewing a report of the Master in Chancery, this Court employs a de novo standard in reviewing questions of law.”
• “De novo review generally means a new trial or hearing on questions of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).