· 4/21/1987
Dighton v. FED. PAC. ELEC. CO. SERT, JACKSON & ASSOC.
Citations
- 506 N.E.2d 509
- 399 Mass. 687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that one reason Massachusetts's statute of repose was enacted was that constructors lack the ability to institute quality control procedures which are available to manufacturers
- fixing scope of protection of SOR to acts “performed with respect to ‘improvement to real estate’ ”
- repose does not extend to manufacturer of mass marketed circuit breaker affixed to real property
- “[T]he inspection, supervision and observation of construction by architects and contractors involves individual expertise not susceptible of the quality control standards of the factory.”
- third-party complaint for contribution dismissed because plaintiff’s claim against third-party defendant was barred by the applicable statute of repose
- repose does not extend to manufacturer of mass marketed circuit breaker affixed to real property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liacos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.