Skip to main content
· 4/21/1987

Dighton v. FED. PAC. ELEC. CO. SERT, JACKSON & ASSOC.

Citations

  • 506 N.E.2d 509
  • 399 Mass. 687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that one reason Massachusetts's statute of repose was enacted was that constructors lack the ability to institute quality control procedures which are available to manufacturers
  • fixing scope of protection of SOR to acts “performed with respect to ‘improvement to real estate’ ”
  • repose does not extend to manufacturer of mass marketed circuit breaker affixed to real property
  • “[T]he inspection, supervision and observation of construction by architects and contractors involves individual expertise not susceptible of the quality control standards of the factory.”
  • third-party complaint for contribution dismissed because plaintiff’s claim against third-party defendant was barred by the applicable statute of repose
  • repose does not extend to manufacturer of mass marketed circuit breaker affixed to real property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Liacos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.