Diggs v. Donahoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Washington anti- SLAPP statute was inapplicable in federal court, at least partially because the Washington Supreme Court had struck it down under the Washington state constitution
• holding that Washington’s anti-SLAPP law, as a whole, is inapplicable in federal court
• deciding that Washington’s anti-SLAPP law, as a whole, is inapplicable in federal court
• affirming district court’s decision that 27 Washington’s Anti-SLAPP statute could not be applied in federal court
• noting, in dicta, that defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion to strike is “far from being ‘collateral’ to the merits”
• stating in dicta that anti-SLAPP motions to strike are not collateral orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).