Digesti & Peck v. Kitchen Factors, Inc. (In Re Kitchen Factors, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is appropriate to abandon the lodestar method where the detail of time spent is grossly disproportionate to the amounts at stake
• stating that lodestar analysis is the primary method, but it is not the exclusive 17 method
• stating that lodestar analysis is the primary 2 method, but it is not the exclusive method
• stating that 3 lodestar analysis is the primary method, but it is not the exclusive method
• stating that lodestar analysis is the primary method, but it is not the 12 exclusive method
• Debt- or-in-possession’s attorney had a duty to the estate not to incur disproportionate legal costs which are paid by the estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).