Skip to main content
· 1/16/2025

DiFiore v. Hirter

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 103

Syllabus

Small claims; landlord; tenant; utility bill; security deposit; deduction; affirmative defense; offset; damages; civil rules; R.C. Ch. 1925; R.C. 1925.16; Civ.R. 1(C)(4); R.C. 5321.16(B). The lower court did not err in determining the defendant-tenant was entitled to an offset against the damages awarded to the plaintiff-landlord for an unpaid utility bill from an amount that was improperly withheld from a security deposit. R.C. Ch. 1925 does not contemplate the filing of an answer, and an offset defense could be asserted at trial. The amount owed for the utility bill should have been applied as a deduction from the security deposit in accordance with R.C. 5321.16(B).

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.