California Supreme Court· 7/28/1896
Dietz v. Kucks
Citations
- 5 Cal. Unrep. 406
- 45 P. 832
- 1896 Cal. LEXIS 1074
Syllabus
<p>Lease—Effect of Assignment.—In the Absence of an Agreement to the contrary, a tenant who assigns his lease for the whole term remains liable thereon to the-landlord, as surety for the assignee.</p> <p>New Trial.—Where There is Any Evidence to Support a verdict, and a motion for a new trial is denied by the court, its judgment will not be reversed on appeal.</p>
Judges: Searls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & Cleaning WorksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-01-03· cited 27×
- Salisbury v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-12-13· cited 20×
- Northern Pacific Terminal Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1886-10-20· cited 18×
- Meyer v. Great Western InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-10-05· cited 11×
- Babcock v. ScovilleIllinois Supreme Court· 1870-09-15· cited 10×
- Mahan v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-12-06· cited 6×
- White v. BeerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-12-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.