Dietz v. Harshbarger

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 2917
• 89 N.E.3d 1271

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee because there is no genuine issue of material fact that defendant-appellee is entitled to immunity under R.C. Chapter 2744. Defendant-appellee is not excepted from immunity under R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) because the stop sign at issue in this case is not included within the definition of a public road. Defendant-appellee is not excepted from immunity under R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) because the placement of a stop-ahead sign does not fall within the meaning of \in repair.\