Skip to main content
· 8/25/1995

Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.

Citations

  • 536 N.W.2d 319
  • 1995 Minn. LEXIS 700
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,721
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1706
  • 1995 WL 502855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a causal connection may be established by the proximity in time between the statutorily protected act and the adverse action
  • affirming summary judgment when no specific accusation of age discrimination before discharge
  • outlining elements of retaliatory-discharge claim under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.