Skip to main content
· 6/8/1988

Diem v. City and County of San Francisco

Citations

  • 686 F. Supp. 806
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5632
  • 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,593
  • 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 242
  • 1988 WL 60505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • naming a defendant in the body of an EEOC complaint or in a claim filed with such a complaint is sufficient to put the defendant on notice
  • an EEOC charge, which named the plaintiff’s “coworkers, immediate supervisors, and Chief of the Fire Department” as the parties which allegedly harassed the plaintiff, would be sufficient to put all the individuals, generally referred to, on notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weigel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.