· 9/29/2010
Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Citations
- 5 A.3d 230
- 607 Pa. 254
- 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an employer/insurer is not required to produce evidence of earning power or job availability to support conversion of a disability designation from total to partial under Section 306(a.2), based on an effective impairment rating of less than 50 percent
- indicating, via citation to Section 306(a.2)(l), that the qualifications of a physician authorized to perform an IRE include designation by the Bureau or selection by the parties
- “If the IRE is requested within the 60-day period and the claimant’s impairment rating is less than 50 percent, then the change in disability status is automatic.”
- elaborating upon the distinction between impairment and disability
- elaborating upon the distinction between impairment and disability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Melvin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.