Skip to main content
· 2/7/2005

Diehl v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 357 F. Supp. 2d 804
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1681
  • 2005 WL 289933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Finding no conflict to exist when a Plaintiff can “satisfy the requirements of the job by reaching, handling, and fingering with his left hand with occasional assistance from his right hand.”
  • “on remand the ALJ should have Plaintiffs reading ability tested”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eduardo C. Robreno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.