· 3/26/1971
Diego Vindigni v. P. Meyer
Citations
- 441 F.2d 376
- 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1436
- 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for evi-dentiary hearing on Rule 60(b)(6) motion where plaintiff’s attorney disappeared, resulting in dismissal of complaint, and plaintiff stated in affidavit that he “tried diligently to find” his attorney over course of eighteen months
- 'the unusual fact of the complete disappearance of plaintiff's attorney' held extraordinary circumstances
- \the unusual fact of the complete disappearance of plaintiff's attorney\ held extraordinary circumstances
- relief available because of complete disappearance of plaintiff’s attorney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Hays, Medina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.