Skip to main content
· 3/26/1971

Diego Vindigni v. P. Meyer

Citations

  • 441 F.2d 376
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1436
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for evi-dentiary hearing on Rule 60(b)(6) motion where plaintiff’s attorney disappeared, resulting in dismissal of complaint, and plaintiff stated in affidavit that he “tried diligently to find” his attorney over course of eighteen months
  • 'the unusual fact of the complete disappearance of plaintiff's attorney' held extraordinary circumstances
  • \the unusual fact of the complete disappearance of plaintiff's attorney\ held extraordinary circumstances
  • relief available because of complete disappearance of plaintiff’s attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hays, Medina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.