Diego Gil v. James Reed, Jaime Penaflor, and United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that facts showing physician’s assistant denied prescribed medication could permit a jury to infer knowledge of risk of harm
• concluding that defendant physician who disregarded surgeon’s postoperative instructions could be found to have been deliberately indifferent
• concluding that facts showing physician’s assistant denied prescribed medication could permit a jury to infer knowledge of risk of harm
• holding that plaintiff showed genuine issue of material fact of doctor’s deliberate indifference when doctor failed to follow specialist’s advice, despite doctor’s excuse for failure
• concluding that reasonable fact-finder could infer deliberate indifference where prison doctor canceled specialist’s prescriptions and substituted medication which specialist had specifically warned was dangerous for persons with plaintiffs condition
• concluding that reasonable fact‐finder could infer deliberate indifference where prison doctor canceled specialist’s prescriptions and substituted medication which specialist had specifically warned was dangerous for persons with plaintiff’s condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).