Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Management Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parol evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of a contract but “is admissible to clarify [an] ambiguity and to show the intent of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).