· 6/28/2001
Diefenbach v. Holmberg
Citations
- 26 P.3d 1186
- 200 Ariz. 415
- 350 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29
- 2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding language regarding non-modifiability is ineffective to prevent termination on death of recipient absent express language regarding termination
- language that spousal-maintenance requirement is “non-modifiable” insufficient to mandate payments after the death of receiving spouse
- statute is to be given such effect that no clause, sentence or word is rendered superfluous, void, contradictory, or insignificant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flórez, Brammer, Pelander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.