Skip to main content
· 6/28/2001

Diefenbach v. Holmberg

Citations

  • 26 P.3d 1186
  • 200 Ariz. 415
  • 350 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 29
  • 2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding language regarding non-modifiability is ineffective to prevent termination on death of recipient absent express language regarding termination
  • language that spousal-maintenance requirement is “non-modifiable” insufficient to mandate payments after the death of receiving spouse
  • statute is to be given such effect that no clause, sentence or word is rendered superfluous, void, contradictory, or insignificant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flórez, Brammer, Pelander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.