· 12/28/1984
Didio v. State
Citations
- 471 N.E.2d 1117
- 1984 Ind. LEXIS 1070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that changing “neither the factual allegations nor the characterization of the offense but merely correct[ing] an erroneous statutory citation” was permissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Hunter, Prentice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.