Dickson v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the observance of spasms and trigger necessitated the conclusion that “the evidence of claimant’s injuries did not consist exclusively of subjective complaints and symptomatology without a diagnosis based upon a 'medical foundation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).