Dickson v. Luck Land Co.
Citations
- 242 U.S. 371
- 37 S. Ct. 167
- 61 L. Ed. 371
- 1917 U.S. LEXIS 2198
Syllabus
<p>Issuance of a.'fee-simple patent for an allotment in the White Earth Indian Reservation, Minnesota, under the clause of the Act .of March 1, 1907, c. 2285, 34 Stat. 1015, 1034, which declares that such allotments when held by adult mixed-blood Indians shall be free of restrictions on alienation and patentable in fee, implies an administrative finding that the patentee was of age when the patent issued.</p> <p>While this finding is decisive of the allottee’s age for the purpose of sustaining his right to the title freed from the restrictions which Congress had imposed by the allotting-acts, c. 119, § 5, 24 Stat. 388; c. 24, § 3, 25 Stat. 642, it does not conclusively establish his majority for the purpose of determining whether a deed of the land which he.1 made after patent was subject, under the state law, .todisaffirmance as a deed made in infancy.</p> <p>The restrictions being removed and the fee simple patent issued, the allottee, pursuant to the Act of May 8, 1906, c. 2348, 34 Stat. 182, becomes subject to, and entitled to the benefit of, the laws of the State' governing the transfer of real property, fixing the age of majority and declaring the disability of minors.</p>
Judges: Van Devanter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-18· cited 546×
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 171×
- United States v. WallerSupreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 71×
- West v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1929-01-02· cited 47×
- Morrow v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1917-05-30· cited 41×
- Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court· 1924-04-14· cited 30×
- Housing Authority of Seminole Nation v. HarjoSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-04-17· cited 18×
- United States v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsTenth Circuit· 1939-01-11· cited 16×
- State v. Zay ZahSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-10-21· cited 14×
- Boller v. Key Bank of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-04-03· cited 13×
- State v. Amerada Petroleum CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1955-08-03· cited 13×
- Dillon v. Antler Land CompanyD. Montana· 1972-05-02· cited 12×
- Baker v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1920-02-20· cited 11×
- United States v. PriceTenth Circuit· 1940-04-08· cited 10×
- Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of HobartE.D. Wisconsin· 2008-03-28· cited 9×
- Spaeth v. United States Secretary of InteriorEighth Circuit· 1985-03-15· cited 6×
- Glacier County v. FrisbeeMontana Supreme Court· 1945-06-28· cited 5×
- Spaeth v. United States Secretary Of The InteriorEighth Circuit· 1985-03-15· cited 4×
- Woodtick v. CrosbyMontana Supreme Court· 1976-01-09· cited 4×
- United States v. KrauseW.D. Louisiana· 1950-09-06· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.